April 2, 2018

General Motors, Uber And Google have been working to perfect self-driving vehicles and Uber has been allowed to conduct self driving tests in three U.S. cities and Toronto. On March 18th an accident in Arizona left a pedestrian dead as was reported in the Arizona Republic Newspaper. The accident remains under investigation and even though fault has yet to be determined the ridesharing company still decided to cease testing all self-driving vehicles. With each new technology that hits the roads, there are new possibilities for accidents and injuries.

The fatality occurred in the Phoenix suburb of Tempe and according to police a 49-year-old woman was crossing the street outside the crosswalk on a Sunday night at around 10:00 pm. An Uber in fully autonomous self-driving mode struck the pedestrian, and sadly the woman ultimately died from her injuries. Arizona law currently allows companies like Uber to test their self driving system with no one in the driver’s seat and as required there was a human in the passenger seat when the fatal accident in Tempe took place. In car video showed the human in the front passenger seat looking at the on board laptop at the time of the collision.

Those pushing the adoption of self-driving vehicles suggest they are a safer alternative to human-operated vehicles because self-driving vehicles don’t become distracted or fail to follow the rules of the road. Self-driving vehicles always follow the rules of the road and their on-board algorithmic assumption presents a potential safety problem. A challenge that exists for self-driving vehicles is how they respond to unexpected human behavior.

The events of the recent Arizona accident which authorities and Uber are still investigating are doing much to shed some light on these challenges. The Police report indicated that the pedestrian was crossing the street outside the crosswalk. The simple act of a pedestrian crossing outside of a crosswalk doesn’t automatically make the pedestrian at fault for any accident that occurs. California law requires pedestrians crossing outside a marked crosswalk to yield to vehicle traffic it is not the only relevant legal factor. Even when a driver has the right of way, he or she still has a legal obligation in California to exercise caution to avoid hitting pedestrians in the roadway.

If lighting and other relevant details indicate a driver should have seen a pedestrian in the road in time to take appropriate evasive action to avoid that pedestrian the driver can still possibly be liable for hitting the pedestrian. This can be true even if the pedestrian was legally required to yield. Some have questioned the technology behind self-driving vehicles and its ability to respond to human variables (like pedestrians crossing outside the crosswalk, pedestrians walking and texting, joggers listening to music with earbuds or drivers committing traffic violations) and to exercise that due care to avoid accidents as required by the law. Those researching self driving technology are struggling with how to teach an autonomous systems to adjust for unpredictable human driving or behavior and this includes distracted driving.

We represent people who are injured because of the careless and reckless acts of others. At the end of the day your case can only be settled one time and you need to know all of the facts beforehand. The reason that insurance companies have paid our clients in excess of $130,000,000.00 is that we get the facts and are not intimidated at the prospect of going to trial when they refuse to follow the law. We help with serious issues that require serious representation. We are the Law Offices of Guenard & Bozarth. We have over 80 years of experience in our plaintiff’s only law firm. Call GB Legal 24/7/365 at 888-809-1075 or visit www.gblegal.com We Can Help!

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

INSURANCE COMPANIES KNOW US BECAUSE THEY’VE PAID OUR CLIENTS OVER $130 MILLION DOLLARS.

$2.9

MILLION

CAR ACCIDENT INJURY

Guenard & Bozarth llp obtained a $2,962,903 jury verdict in the Sacramento County Superior Court for plaintiff David Schoonover, who suffered head and neck injuries and fractures in a head-on accident on Roseville Road in Roseville on July 22, 2012

$300

THOUSAND

HAIR SALON INJURY

Guenard & Bozarth LLP recently settled a case for $300,000 involving a hair weave that went terribly wrong. Our client was a young lady, and aspiring model, who experienced pressure necrosis from a tight weave and it changed her life.

$500

THOUSAND

SLIP & FALL INJURY

Guenard & Bozarth LLP recently settled a slip and fall case for $500,000 a couple weeks before trial. The client slipped and fell on a wet piece of cardboard in a grocery store and sustained a serious shoulder injury that required surgery.

$300

THOUSAND

NEGLIGENCE INJURY

On February 13, 2013 Maricela, a Certified Nursing Assistant presented to Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Emergency Room with complaint of neck and back pain. She was diagnosed with a neck strain and was given Ibuprofen and instructed to return if her symptoms did not subside.

YOUR STORY MATTERS TO US

Contact Preferences

How would you like to be contacted? Check all that apply.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Never in my life did I think I would recommend an attorney. Somehow God sent this angel of an attorney to assist me in my personal injury lawsuit. I was told by lawyers in Bakersfield that my lawsuit was frivolous because there was money in it.

– Bill
Read More

I live in Elk Grove where we don’t always have a lot of choices. Lawyers are one area where we have few good choices. I wanted to work with a local law firm after my motorcycle accident, and I chose Glenn Guenard and Ross Bozarth.

– Lloyd
Read More

My daughter was involved in an automobile accident in an intersection on her 17th birthday. The other person said it was her fault and my daughter said her light was green. I am not the sort of person who sues but my insurance
– Sharon
Read More